PART VII — On Living Inside the Unresolved
PART VII
On Living Inside the Unresolved
Neither Flagellation Nor Acquittal
“Anxiety is the dizziness of freedom.”
— Søren Kierkegaard
“The healthiest relationship to your worst act is not peace. It is a permanently open file that you check on, honestly, without needing to close it.”
— Syed Muhammad Hur Jaffri
- The Two Failures
Having spent six parts dismantling the comfortable resolutions, I am obligated now to say something about what remains available, because a philosophy that only demolishes and offers nothing to stand on afterward has performed half its task and abandoned the reader in the rubble.
There are two failures available to the person who has genuinely sinned and genuinely tried to reckon with it, and I want to name both, because most people, in my observation, oscillate between them rather than settling into either, which is itself informative.
The first failure is acquittal — everything this book has spent six parts naming and resisting. The justification that dissolves the weight, the growth narrative that converts the victim into a supporting character, the comfortable synthesis that arrives too easily and holds too well. This failure is attractive because it is livable. It lets you continue. Its cost is paid by someone else, or by the truth.
The second failure is flagellation — the refusal to allow any explanation, any growth, any integration at all, on the theory that continued suffering is the only proof of sufficient remorse. This failure looks, superficially, like the opposite of the first, like moral seriousness taken to its furthest and most admirable extreme. I want to argue that it is not admirable. It is, in its own way, exactly as self-centered as acquittal, because it keeps the entire drama focused on your suffering, your inadequacy, your permanent unworthiness — a theater of guilt that produces nothing for anyone except the grim satisfaction of having punished yourself thoroughly enough.
Flagellation is acquittal's twin, not its opposite. Both keep the story about you. One tells the story as your redemption. The other tells it as your damnation. Neither one requires you to do the only thing that was ever actually required: to change how you act toward the people currently in your life, starting now, without needing the internal verdict to be finalized first.
7.1 Kierkegaard and the Discipline of Not Resolving
Kierkegaard's account of anxiety is useful here in a way that is easy to miss on first reading. Anxiety, for Kierkegaard, is not a symptom to be cured. It is the correct, appropriate response of a free creature standing before the abyss of its own possibility — the dizziness that comes from realizing you could have acted otherwise, that the ground beneath your choices is not solid necessity but open freedom, and that this openness is genuinely vertiginous rather than merely uncomfortable.
Applied to sin and repentance, I want to suggest that the anxiety this book's opening preface confessed to — the fear of finding the justification, the fear that the justification and the repentance cannot be told apart — is not a problem to be solved by the book's final part. It is the correct state to remain in, indefinitely, because the alternative states, on either side, are both a form of premature closure. The anxiety is not the disease. The anxiety is the evidence that you have not yet lied to yourself in either direction.
Perhaps the discipline is not to resolve the anxiety but to develop a sustainable relationship with it — to carry the open question the way you would carry a chronic condition that is not fatal but is also never going to be cured: managed, attended to, checked on regularly, never forgotten long enough to become comfortable, never dwelt on so obsessively that it becomes the whole of your life.
7.2 What Repentance Might Actually Mean, Provisionally
I want to offer, with full awareness of the provisionality the entire book has insisted on, the closest thing to a positive account I am able to construct.
Repentance, perhaps, is not a state you arrive at and then possess. It is not the successful production of a feeling, a peace, a resolved narrative you can recite at dinner. It is closer to a discipline, practiced daily, with three components held together in a tension that never fully resolves: the honest explanation, pursued without flinching, because blind guilt teaches nothing; the refusal to let the explanation harden into justification, checked continuously against the grammar tests and the trade tests this book has offered; and the concrete, ongoing action, visible in the world, toward people who can actually receive it, that treats the insight as a debt to be paid forward rather than an asset to be enjoyed.
This is not peace. I want to be honest that I am not offering you peace, because I do not think peace is what the subject deserves, and I am suspicious of any account of repentance that arrives at peace and stays there. What I am offering is a way of carrying the unresolved that does not collapse into either the comfort of acquittal or the theater of permanent punishment. It is harder than both. I think it may also be the only honest option available.
7.3 The Last Question
You began this book with a sin in mind. You have been asked, at several points, to sit with it rather than resolve it. I am going to ask you, one final time, not to answer the question but to notice your own resistance to answering it.
Has anything in these pages changed what you are going to do tomorrow — not what you are going to feel, not what story you are going to tell, but what you are actually going to do, in the world, toward the specific people currently in your life? If the honest answer is no, then this book, however much it may have interested you, has functioned exactly like every justification it warned you against: sophisticated, engaging, deeply felt, and entirely private.
I cannot make the answer yes for you. I am not certain I have fully made it yes for myself. This is, I think, the only honest place a book like this can end.
Syed Muhammad Hur Jaffri · The Open Manuscript